Why the study?
Does coronary artery stenting improve myocardial salvage compared to thrombolysis across different time-to-treatment intervals in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
264 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) pooled from 2 randomized trials
Comparison
Coronary artery stenting vs Thrombolysis
Design
Meta-analysis, Patients were randomized to coronary stenting or thrombolysis…
Authors
Loading...
Supports primary stenting over thrombolysis with treatment delays; extends evidence for time-dependent myocardial salvage in AMI.
Does coronary artery stenting improve myocardial salvage compared to thrombolysis across different time-to-treatment intervals in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Coronary artery stenting provides superior myocardial salvage compared to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, with the magnitude of benefit increasing as the time from symptom onset to treatment is prolonged.
Schömig et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: