Why the study?
Does single versus double balloon injury affect arterial remodeling and neoadventitial formation in porcine coronary arteries?
Does single versus double balloon injury affect arterial remodeling and neoadventitial formation in porcine coronary arteries?
Accumulation of neoadventitia is the earliest change following balloon injury, and arterial remodeling is the predominant mechanism for lumenal narrowing after single but not double balloon injury.
Animal data on injury-specific contracture warrant no clinical practice change; extends preclinical insights into differential remodeling.
OBJECTIVES: Arterial remodeling has been suggested as the predominant factor in restenosis. However, the time course and morphometric factors that determine whether remodeling occurs remain unclear. We hypothesized that arterial remodeling does not occur in all arteries following balloon injury and is dependent on neoadventitial formation. METHODS: Using single (SI) and double (DI) balloon injury of Yorkshire porcine coronary arteries we examined changes in morphometry 3, 7, 14, 28 days following balloon injury. RESULTS: In both SI and DI arteries, the neoadventitia (NAD) area expanded by day 3 and was the first compartment to increase following injury. In SI arteries lumen area (LA) decreased between day 3 and 14 while in DI arteries, there was significantly less loss in LA. In SI arteries, contracture of the area circumscribed by the external elastic lamina (EEL), which occurred predominantly between day 7 and 14, accounted for 67% of the loss of LA. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulation of NAD appears to be the earliest change in the vessel wall following balloon injury of normal or previously injured arteries and precedes the growth of the I + M (intima and media). The predominant mechanism for lumenal narrowing following single balloon injury of a normal artery is remodeling. In contrast, remodeling does not occur in DI arteries, possibly due to differences in the degree of adventitial fibrosis of normal and injured arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marino Labinaz (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: