Why the study?
What is the current data on antithrombotic management for patients undergoing transcatheter interventions for valvular and structural heart diseases?
What is the current data on antithrombotic management for patients undergoing transcatheter interventions for valvular and structural heart diseases?
This review provides an overview of antithrombotic management strategies to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing structural heart interventions.
Emphasizes individualized antithrombotic strategies for structural interventions; leaves open optimal regimens pending dedicated trials.
Transcatheter interventions for valvular and structural heart diseases are rapidly expanding due to greater operators' experience and development of new generation devices associated with increased procedural safety. They represent the standard strategy for patients with prohibitive risk for open surgery. These procedures are associated with a significant occurrence of both thrombotic and bleeding complications, thus in this setting, even more than in other percutaneous procedures, the balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is critical. This review describes the current data available on the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system, percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO)/atrial septal defects (ASD) closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nusca et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: