Key result
OSA treatment post-PCI is linked to ~70% lower 5-year cardiac death risk vs no treatment.
Why the study?
It is not known whether treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients who have had PCI results in better cardiovascular outcomes.
Does treatment for obstructive sleep apnea reduce cardiac death and adverse events in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
371 patients with OSA diagnosed by polysomnography who underwent PCI
Comparison
Treated OSA vs untreated OSA
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Follow-up
5 years
Authors
Loading...
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a significant reduction in cardiac death at 5 years.
Cohort (n=371)
Does treatment for obstructive sleep apnea reduce cardiac death and adverse events in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.027
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a significant reduction in cardiac death at 5 years.
Cassar et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Obstructive sleep apnea and percutaneous coronary intervention (n=371). Treatment for obstructive sleep apnea vs. Untreated obstructive sleep apnea was evaluated on cardiac death (p=0.027). Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients who underwent PCI was associated with a significantly lower rate of cardiac death at 5 years compared to untreated patients (3% vs. 10%, p=0.027).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: