Systematic review assesses oncologic benefit of lymph node dissection during cystectomy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, suggesting improved outcomes in high-risk patients.
Background and objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard for muscle-invasive disease (MIBC) and utilised frequently in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is routinely performed during RC for MIBC, demonstrating a survival benefit. However, the oncologic value in NMIBC remains uncertain. As such, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether PLND confers an oncologic benefit in NMIBC patients undergoing RC. Materials and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed (January 1989-January 2025) was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (CRD42023443011). Eligible studies included NMIBC patients undergoing RC with or without PLND. Data extraction and quality assessment (ROBINS-I, MINORS) were performed independently by two reviewers. Results: = 35 793) met inclusion criteria. Lymph node positivity ranged from 0% to 13%. Comparative studies consistently demonstrated improved overall survival and cancer-specific survival with PLND, particularly among pT1 subgroups (pooled 5-year OS = 71.8%, 95% CI 59.3-84.3). Several studies demonstrated a dose-response association between lymph node yield or dissection extent and improved outcomes. Benefits were inconsistent for Ta/Tis disease. Pathological upstaging occurred in 16%-36% of clinically staged cohorts. However, study quality was moderate, with heterogeneity in PLND definitions, staging methods and adjuvant treatment use. Conclusions: PLND appears to improve staging and survival in high-risk NMIBC, especially pT1 disease. Routine PLND for low-risk Ta/Tis disease is unsupported. Standardised definitions of PLND extent and prospective evaluation are needed to confirm its therapeutic role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: