PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026BJUI Compass0 citationsOpen Access

Lymph node dissection during cystectomy for non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review

View Full Paper
SLSean LimLSLucielle StandishHLHarrison Liu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the oncologic benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.
  • Conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1989 to January 2025
  • Included non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection
  • Performed data extraction and quality assessment independently by two reviewers.
  • Lymph node positivity ranged from 0% to 13% among included studies.
  • Pooled 5-year overall survival for pT1 patients with PLND was 71.8% (95% CI 59.3-84.3).
  • Pathological upstaging occurred in 16%-36% of clinically staged cohorts.

Abstract

Background and objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard for muscle-invasive disease (MIBC) and utilised frequently in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is routinely performed during RC for MIBC, demonstrating a survival benefit. However, the oncologic value in NMIBC remains uncertain. As such, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether PLND confers an oncologic benefit in NMIBC patients undergoing RC. Materials and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed (January 1989-January 2025) was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (CRD42023443011). Eligible studies included NMIBC patients undergoing RC with or without PLND. Data extraction and quality assessment (ROBINS-I, MINORS) were performed independently by two reviewers. Results: = 35 793) met inclusion criteria. Lymph node positivity ranged from 0% to 13%. Comparative studies consistently demonstrated improved overall survival and cancer-specific survival with PLND, particularly among pT1 subgroups (pooled 5-year OS = 71.8%, 95% CI 59.3-84.3). Several studies demonstrated a dose-response association between lymph node yield or dissection extent and improved outcomes. Benefits were inconsistent for Ta/Tis disease. Pathological upstaging occurred in 16%-36% of clinically staged cohorts. However, study quality was moderate, with heterogeneity in PLND definitions, staging methods and adjuvant treatment use. Conclusions: PLND appears to improve staging and survival in high-risk NMIBC, especially pT1 disease. Routine PLND for low-risk Ta/Tis disease is unsupported. Standardised definitions of PLND extent and prospective evaluation are needed to confirm its therapeutic role.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5308071d4f1bdfc5fefhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70201
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper