Explores agreement in Japhug, revealing crucial distinctions between two types of zeros.
This paper explores the interaction between the syntax and morphology of agreement, using Japhug (Trans-Himalayan) as a case study. The complex agreement paradigm in Japhug provides evidence that not all non-overt realizations of formal features are equal. Specifically, two types of zeros are needed in morphological theory to account for the paradigm: a surface zero—a phonologically null exponent, and a deep zero—the non-insertion of vocabulary items.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiūshí Chén (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: