PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026Geotechnical and Geological Engineering4 citationsOpen Access

Settlement and Mobilized Bearing Capacity of Circular Footings on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Sand: Experimental and Numerical Study

ATAbdollah TabaroeiYZYang ZhaoTPTuan A. Pham

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the performance of circular footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand through an integrated experimental and numerical approach.
  • Conducted large-scale plate tests on geogrid-reinforced sand and validated 3D numerical simulations with geocell reinforcement.
  • Analyzed experimental data to generate settlement-dependent performance maps and empirical equations for design guidance.
  • Evaluated bearing improvement factors and physical performance parameters under various conditions.
  • Geogrid tests showed bearing improvement factors up to 1.82 for settlement ratios above 5%.
  • Numerical analyses reproduced experimental results within 10%, revealing deeper mobilization of soil mass with geocells.
  • Settlement-dependent empirical equations demonstrated validity with MAE ≤ 10–15% for predicting foundation performance.

Abstract

Abstract Circular footings are common in towers and tanks but their performance on geosynthetic-reinforced sands remains underexplored. We present an integrated experimental–numerical–analytical study using large-scale plate tests on geogrid-reinforced sand and validated 3D simulations extended to geocell reinforcement. The work delivers settlement-dependent performance maps and a bounded predictor for design. Geogrid tests show bearing improvement factors up to I f = 1.82 (for s/D > 5%) and PRS reductions up to 25%. Optimum ranges are u/D≈0.10–0.25, WD ≤ 1.5 (≈WD 2. Numerical analyses reproduce experiments within ≈10% and reveal deeper mobilization of soil mass with geocells, explaining plateaus observed at large WD and depth. A settlement-dependent empirical equation is proposed with stated validity ranges and external validation (MAE ≤ 10–15%). The results provide mechanistic insight and practical guidance for circular foundations reinforced by geosynthetics, emphasizing when reinforcement is most effective and when densification or fewer layers suffice. This integrated approach advances understanding of soil–footing–reinforcement interaction and offers practical design guidance for circular foundations on granular soils.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tabaroei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5618071d4f1bdfc61bdhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-026-03677-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper