Assesses vehicle emissions in varying weather, suggesting vision-based methods improve accuracy.
This study presents a vision-based framework for accurate vehicle speed estimation and real-world emission assessment at urban signalized intersections under challenging weather conditions. Using a publicly available dataset recorded in Curitiba, Brazil, comprising five videos (total duration 132 min) captured by a single low-cost 5 MP camera under cloudy, sunny, dusty, heavy rain, and low-visibility conditions, vehicles were detected with YOLOv11 and tracked using ByteTrack. Speed was estimated through a monocular vision pipeline calibrated against radar ground truth. The proposed speed estimation method achieved outstanding accuracy, with mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 0.38 to 0.84 km/h and standard deviation below 0.96 km/h across all weather scenarios, significantly outperforming existing vision-only approaches. Two emission models were implemented: (1) MOVESTAR using measured speeds and vehicle classification, and (2) SUMO with real trajectory enforcement via TraCI to create a high-fidelity digital twin of the intersection. When the whole four-lane region was analyzed (439 vehicles total), MOVESTAR yielded average emissions of CO₂ 2.02 g/mi, HC 0.018 g/mi, NOx 0.058 g/mi, and fuel consumption 93.15 g/mi. After unit standardization to g/km and statistical comparison via paired t-tests, MOVESTAR consistently produced significantly lower and more realistic emission estimates than SUMO for fuel, CO₂, NOx, and HC (p < 0.01), with CO₂ and fuel showing the most significant differences (- 12 g/km and - 18.57 g/km, respectively). Heavy rain and dusty conditions were identified as the most challenging environments, whereas cloudy and sunny weather provided the highest accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fawzy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: