This overview demonstrates the potential benefits of multi-criteria decision-making in forest management planning, suggesting improvements for managing competing interests.
Forest management planning comprises multiple products, goods, and services and is characterized by multiple conflicting interests. Thus, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) immediately suggests itself. However, reports on MCDM seem to be dispersed. It is attempted to provide a generally accepted metaphor, to increase the understanding of, to relate MCDM to traditional methods, and to suggest a ranking of the methods with respect to beneficial use within forest management planning. It is concluded that MCDM methods, with focus on duality values, comprise great prospects for application to multiple-use forestry, alleviating some of the shortcomings associated with the traditional “one-criterion” management paradigm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarp et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: