Evaluation reveals historical features at The Sheppey site, indicating past land use and settlement.
The evaluation fieldwork comprised the excavation of eight trenches, in the locations shown on the attached plan. Seven of the trenches measured 25m in length, and a single trench measured 30m in length; all trenches measured 1.8m in width. The trenches represented a 2% sample of the c. 1.85ha proposed built development area, located in the western part of the wider site (see Fig. 2 for extent); the trenches were located to test geophysical anomalies and to provide a representative sample of the remainder of the site. In December 2025, Cotswold Archaeology carried out an archaeological evaluation of land at The Sheppey, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire. A total of eight trenches were excavated. A number of broadly north/south aligned ditches, correlating closely to linear anomalies seemingly representing a droveway or trackway, as identified by the preceding geophysical survey, were recorded in three trenches excavated in the western half of the site. Two sherds of pottery of a broad Roman date were recovered from the fill of one of these ditches. A further east/west aligned ditch, seemingly representing a field boundary associated with this droveway/trackway, was identified in a trench excavated in the southern part of the site. Evidence of medieval/post-medieval ridge and furrow cultivation, in the form of extant earthworks, was noted throughout the site. Where observed, this correlated closely to a number of linear trends identified by the preceding geophysical survey indicative of ridge and furrow cultivation. A single sherd of mid 16th to 18th-century pottery was recovered from a ploughsoil layer identified in a trench excavated in the southern part of the site. An undated pit was identified in a trench excavated in the southern part of the site, however the function of this pit remains unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R Scurr (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: