PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Strategic realignment in South Asia: US perceptions of Pakistan's China alignment

View Full Paper
MSMuhammad Shakeel Ahmad SiddiquiSBSyed Shahid Hussain BukhariBahauddin Zakariya University

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to examine the evolving US perceptions of Pakistan in the context of its alignment with China.
  • Analyzed US government documents and media discourse from 2001 to 2025
  • Used constructivist theory to interpret the findings
  • Investigated the implications of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)
  • US policy increasingly emphasized anti-India rhetoric, marginalizing Pakistan in regional dynamics
  • The alignment of Pakistan with China strengthened notably under the CPEC framework
  • Findings suggest that US must avoid binary alliances to prevent strategic misalignments.

Abstract

The US historically viewed Pakistan as a critical ally in its global war on terror, but this stance has changed dramatically in the last few years as the US’s conception of Pakistan transitioned from a strategic partner to a transactional ally and leaning more towards China. This shift is analyzed using constructivist theory based on a multiplicity of US government documents, media discourse, and policies outlined between 2001 and 2025. The analysis shows that US policy characterized by anti-India rhetorical tropes, institutional exclusion, and systemic marginalization subsequently aligned Pakistan more closely to China, most notably under the auspices of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The investigation then contextualizes this shift in a broader hegemonic battle between the US and China, and Pakistan's geostrategic location as the pivot of that struggle. In the end the analysis argues that US policy must adopt a more symmetric regional approach that avoids binary alliances, including antagonistic ties, that lead to strategic misalignments as what is found through this case study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Siddiqui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5f38071d4f1bdfc680chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19954589
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceptions, Power, and Polarization: U.S. Strategic Views on Pakistan’s Emerging Alliance with China2025
  2. 2Pakistan’s Strategic Partnerships: A Comparative Analysis of Ties with the US and China2025
  3. 3Examining Pakistan's Strategic Hedging Between the United States and China2026
  4. 4United States–China Geopolitical Competition in South Asia: Pakistan's Strategic Response and Balancing Act2026
  5. 5INDO-US STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT IN THE INDO-PACIFIC: CHALLENGES AND CHOICES FOR PAKISTAN2026