What question did this study set out to answer?

This work explores the limitations of the current cancer model, focusing on identity persistence under transformation.

May 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Why the Current Model of Cancer is Incomplete

Key Points

This work explores the limitations of the current cancer model, focusing on identity persistence under transformation.
Exploratory predecessor framework outlining identity persistence and admissibility constraints.
Developmental framing of concepts related to probability, universality, and ontology.
Identified critical gaps in the cancer model concerning identity persistence and transformation.
Outlined conceptual shifts necessary for a more comprehensive understanding of cancer.

Abstract

Supersession Note — April 30, 2026 This CODES-era work is an exploratory predecessor and is no longer the canonical statement of the author’s program. It has been superseded by the identity-persistence stack: Universal Identity and Persistence: https://zenodo.org/records/19904166 Identity Persistence Calculus: https://zenodo.org/records/19905404 The Unclosable Bridge: https://zenodo.org/records/19601328 The Bounded Corridor: https://zenodo.org/records/19645631 Claims in this record concerning replacement of probability, universality, ontology, physics, intelligence, biology, governance, or reality should be read as developmental framing, not as the current formal claim. The current claim is restricted to identity persistence under transformation within explicit admissibility constraints: recurrence comparability, admissible redescription, bounded drift, and scalar governance.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper