Multi-case study examines democratic education practices in pesantren, revealing a hybrid governance model suggesting guided participation.
Democratic education in Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) is frequently understood as an implicit cultural outcome of religious traditions rather than a product of intentional institutional governance. This study addresses this gap by examining how democratic education is organised and enacted within pesantren management structures. Using a qualitative multi-case study of three pesantren in Cianjur, Indonesia, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis, and analysed through cross-case thematic comparison. The findings reveal a hybrid governance model in which participatory practices are embedded within kyai-centred authority. Democratic planning is conducted through consultative forums, organisational arrangements combine hierarchical leadership with student self-governance, and democratic enactment occurs through student organisations, deliberative forums, and regulated leadership elections. Monitoring relies primarily on dialogic evaluation and collective reflection. Conceptually, the study introduces a tradition-based democratic governance model. It reframes democratic education in pesantren as a process of guided participation, extending hidden curriculum theory by demonstrating how participatory values are institutionally structured within faith-based educational settings. These findings contribute to broader debates on culturally embedded democratic governance in education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: