Demonstrates effective monitoring of health coverage in Malawi, suggesting improved resource allocation.
Universal health coverage requires identifying who is covered by which services. However, weak health information systems hinder monitoring coverage of Essential Health Benefit Packages (EHBPs). We developed a method for measuring input-adjusted coverage, a potential coverage metric, combining geographic proximity with minimum-input facility readiness, using Malawi as a case study. We mapped the Disease Control Priorities Project interventions to the 2019 Harmonized Health Facility Assessment, constructing transparent input-based readiness indicators. We assessed readiness and generated readiness bottleneck cascades for 129 interventions in 563 publicly financed healthcare facilities. We conducted service area analysis, assessing national and district-level coverage within 5 and 25 km catchment areas based on health service level. Findings revealed high childhood vaccinations, HIV, and malaria management readiness and coverage compared to non-communicable diseases and surgical care. This method repurposes facility surveys and provides actionable insights on supply-side gaps for EHBP planning, resource allocation, and monitoring in low-resource settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: