Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates four-factor model of mindful eating in French, indicating usefulness for clinical assessment.
< .001; robust root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.06, 90% CI [0.053, 0.063]; comparative fit index = 0.98; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.98; and standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.07. FFaMES-F supports the original four-factor model and demonstrates adequate construct validity. The scale shows promise as a tool for clinical practice and empirical research to assess mindful eating and its relationship with dysregulated eating behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrière et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: