PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 20260 citations

Profiling and Mapping Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Research Frameworks: Protocol for a Scoping Review to Guide Integration.

View Full Paper
SMSiobhan McCarthyCollege of Healthcare ManagementJPJill PootsTrinity CollegeJMJohn McCaffreyPopulation Council

Key Points

  • This research aims to integrate quality improvement and patient safety frameworks to guide prioritization in the Irish healthcare system.
  • Scoping review following JBI guidelines to assess existing literature from 2000-2025.
  • Databases searched include Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.
  • Independent screening by two reviewers, resolving discrepancies with a third reviewer.
  • Findings will assist in creating a meta-framework for prioritizing quality improvement and patient safety research in Ireland.
  • The developed framework aims to enhance knowledge translation and implementation in various healthcare contexts.

Abstract

A core remit of the Evidence Based QUality Improvement and Patient Safety (EQUIPS) Research Network (2024-2029) is to inform research priorities for the Irish healthcare system. Previously, research prioritisation exercises have treated quality improvement (QI) and patient safety research as separate fields. Given the growth of QI research, an integrated approach is required to generate a full view of the continuum of knowledge generation and translation activities in quality and safety contexts. The co-creation of a Conceptual Framework for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Research among researchers, knowledge users and patient groups is required to outline important topics, research questions and methodologies, applicable to all areas of healthcare. A scoping review of the literature is first needed to examine existing QI and patient safety research frameworks to inform the development of a harmonised conceptual framework for the Irish context. Methods The scoping review will follow JBI guidelines for developing and co-creating scoping review protocols with knowledge users. The completed review will be reported according to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews, and Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 (GRIPP2) checklist which supports enhanced reporting of patient and public involvement in research. We will search the following databases from 2000-2025 focussing on literature sources from developed countries: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science. We will map included papers using an extraction template developed to fulfil the study aims. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, and discrepancies will be addressed by consensus using a third reviewer. Dissemination Findings will be used to inform the development of a meta-framework that will be used to guide QI and patient safety research priority setting, measurement and monitoring, implementation, and knowledge translation activities in Ireland, at local and national levels. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FGWUA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McCarthy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6968071d4f1bdfc74e8https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14173.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global priorities for patient safety research2009 · 258 citations
  2. 2What Exactly Is Patient Safety?2009 · 182 citations
  3. 3Identifying primary care patient safety research priorities in the UK: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership2018 · 52 citations
  4. 4Building the Bridge to Quality: An Urgent Call to Integrate Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Education With Clinical Care2019 · 62 citations
  5. 5Scoping reviews2024 · 948 citations