Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 30, 2009Prehospital Emergency CareOpen Access

Comparison of Low-Energy Versus High-Energy Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks Following Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GWGregory P. WalcottHeritage Christian UniversitySMSharon B. MelnickUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamCKCheryl R. KillingsworthUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Walcott et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6f1afbc46ec1a8b7c64f2https://doi.org/10.3109/10903120903349838
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Low‐Energy Impedance‐Compensating Biphasic Waveforms Terminate Ventricular Fibrillation at High Rates in Victims of Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest1997 · 134 citations
  2. 2Hemodynamic effects of ventricular defibrillation1970 · 77 citations
  3. 3Electrical Dose for Ventricular Defibrillation of Large and Small Animals Using Precordial Electrodes1974 · 138 citations