Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• COVID-19 increased medical waste to 29,000 tonnes/day, straining global systems. • Plasma treatment achieves 90–97 % waste reduction with 78.61 % cold gas efficiency. • Blockchain tracking reduces waste mishandling by 30 % and improves cost efficiency. • Circular economy integration achieves 65 % material recovery, reducing disposal costs. This comprehensive review addresses critical challenges in modern medical waste management, a concern significantly heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our work uniquely synthesizes and critically assesses emerging technologies, their economic feasibility, and sustainability frameworks within a post-COVID-19 context. The analysis reveals that while conventional incineration remains a dominant practice (60–75 % of global medical waste), it carries considerable environmental risks. In contrast, emerging solutions like plasma gasification and advanced pyrolysis are promising, but face significant implementation barriers. While plasma systems achieve a 90–97 % waste volume reduction and over 99.99 % pathogen elimination, and pyrolysis efficiently converts plastic waste into valuable fuels (35–50 wt% liquid oil), their high capital costs and operational complexities require careful consideration. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated waste pressures, increasing global medical waste production by an estimated 3.4 kg per bed per day, with surges up to 425 % in developing nations. We identify significant disparities in management, as many low-income countries face substantial infrastructure and resource challenges that hinder the adoption of these advanced technologies. This work concludes with a critical roadmap for future research and policy, emphasizing the need for robust technical innovations and harmonized international standards to foster more sustainable and pragmatic practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nematollahi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: