Why the study?
The management of chronic coronary syndrome is largely informed by studies predominantly including men, leaving the relationship between patient sex, CCS endotypes, and clinical outcomes unclear.
Are there sex differences in the prevalence and outcomes of different endotypes of chronic coronary syndrome in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
Are there sex differences in the prevalence and outcomes of different endotypes of chronic coronary syndrome in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
In symptomatic patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing invasive angiography, men have a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD and worse cardiovascular outcomes, while women have a higher prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support sex-stratified risk assessment in chronic coronary syndrome; leaves open whether endotype-guided strategies differ by sex.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is informed by studies predominantly including men. This study investigated the relationship between patients sex and different endotypes of CCS, including sex-specific clinical outcomes. METHODS: In patients with CCS undergoing coronary angiography, invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) were measured. Patients were stratified into groups: 1) obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD) (FFR≤0.80, no revascularization), 2) undergoing revascularization, 3) non-obstructive coronary artery disease with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) (FFR>0.80, CFR≤2.5), and 4) non-obstructive coronary artery disease without CMD (FFR>0.80 and CFR>2.5). RESULTS: 1836 patients (2335 vessels) were included, comprising 1359 (74.0%) men and 477 (26.0%) women. oCAD was present in 14.1% and was significantly less prevalent in women than in men (10.3% vs 15.5%, respectively p < 0.01). Revascularization was present in 30.9% and was similarly prevalent in women and men (28.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively p = 0.13). CMD was present in 24.2% and was significantly more prevalent in women than men (28.6% vs 22.6%, respectively p < 0.01). Normal invasive measurements were found in 564 patients (33.0% women vs 30.0% men, p = 0.23). Male sex was associated with an increased risk of target vessel failure compared to women (HR.1.89, 95% CI 1.12-3.18, p = 0.018), regardless of CCS-endotype. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences exist in the prevalence and outcomes of different endotypes of CCS in symptomatic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. In particular, oCAD (and subsequent revascularization) were more prevalent in men. Conversely, CMD was more prevalent in women. Overall, men experienced a worse cardiovascular outcome compared to women, independent of any specific CCS endotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vink et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: