Outlines the runtime architecture and authority governors for the STA controllability framework, suggesting improved control mechanisms.
This record is Paper 3 of the Signal-Time-Authority (STA) Series. Paper 3 specifies the runtime deployment architecture for the STA pre-commitment controllability framework introduced in Paper 1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19980763 It complements the staged C++17 synthetic toy-simulation evidence reported in Paper 2: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19984104 This paper focuses on authority governors, non-bypassable commitment gates, pre-registered pi_STA policies, sandboxing, rollback, fallback routing, bypass testing, hysteresis, human override policy, and audit-log requirements. This is a PublicRelease v1.0 record.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Htet Ko Ko Naing (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: