Background/Aim: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a relevant global public health challenge with dyslipidemia as a major modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF). Recent advances have introduced injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLT). Their clinical effectiveness in real-world practice seems to depend not only on pharmacological efficacy but also on patients’ acceptance, adherence, and persistence, influenced directly by perceived barriers and facilitators. The main objective of this scoping review is to map the barriers and facilitators related to the use of novel injectable LLTs among adult patients with dyslipidemia or CVD. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR); pre-registration on Open Science Framework (OSF) was performed. A search was conducted in MEDLINE from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar up to June 2025. Eligible studies included qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, and review papers involving adult patients with dyslipidemia who reported experiences, perceptions or challenges related to the use of injectable LLT in any healthcare or community setting worldwide. Two reviewers independently screened studies, selected and extracted data. Results: Out of 665 records identified, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients’ adherence to injectable LLTs is shaped by psychological fears, prior negative experiences, and perceived efficacy. Satisfaction increases when patients feel supported and informed. Convenience, self-administration, and motivational meaning facilitate persistence. Organizational support and economic accessibility further influence uptake, highlighting that adherence depends on both patient experience and structural factors. Conclusions: Patient acceptance and persistence with injectable LLT depends on a complex interplay of emotional, clinical, organizational and economic factors, beyond pharmacological efficacy alone. Fear of injections, previous statin-related experiences, administrative complexity, and high costs remain major barriers, while shared decision-making, trust in healthcare providers, perceived efficacy, regimen convenience, and supportive structures act as strong facilitators. Addressing these challenges requires multidimensional and multidisciplinary strategies for policy makers and clinical managers.
Caggianelli et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: