Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study compares training load across sex, age group, race distance preferences, and training phases.
AimThis retrospective cohort study aimed to describe a large dataset of objective training load (TL) data from training sessions of age-group triathletes and to compare sex, age group, race distance preferences, and training phases.MethodsAn online survey collected TL data from 95 age-group triathletes (18 female, 77 male) in 25 countries. The data included the distance, duration, average heart rate, and training stress score (TSS) for 34,731 training sessions. A Linear Mixed Model analysis was completed, and neither age nor sex was associated with TL (p > 0.05), and mean heart rate (% of HRmax) was not associated with any factors.ResultsThe TL of long-course triathletes (615 min./wk, 171 Km/wk, 574 TSS/wk) was higher than that of short-course athletes (507 min./wk, 118 Km/wk, 452 TSS/wk). There were differences (p < 0.05) in TL between four training phases, with the ’specific’ phase having the highest TL (556 min./wk, 166 Km/wk, 620 TSS/wk) and off-season the lowest (340 min./wk, 84 Km/wk, 364 TSS/wk). Differences (p < 0.05) in TL based on race distance and training phase align with evidence-based practice.ConclusionsComparisons of TL with the cohort values reported here may be helpful to coaches and athletes, given the previous absence of objective age-group athlete datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wells et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: