PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Behavioral Sciences2 citationsOpen Access

How Do Children Evaluate Scientific Explanations Provided by Digital Voice Assistants, Teachers, and Peers?

View Full Paper
AHAmanda S. HaberSKSona C. KumarMSMelia Swenson

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how children evaluate scientific explanations from digital voice assistants compared to peers and teachers.
  • Two experiments with a total of 310 children aged 4-6.
  • Modified selective trust design to assess information-seeking behaviors.
  • Children asked questions to either a digital voice assistant, a peer, or a teacher and evaluated the explanations they received.
  • Children preferred explanations from the digital voice assistant over peer and teacher sources.
  • Significantly higher trust levels were noted for explanations from the digital voice assistant compared to both peers and teachers.
  • Findings indicate that digital voice assistants may enhance children's science engagement and critical thinking.

Abstract

As of 2025, there are approximately 154.3 million voice assistant users in the United States (Emarketer, 2025). Given the prevalence of digital voice assistants in children’s lives, it is critical to understand how children interact with and learn from such digital technologies. Across two experiments, we utilized a modified selective trust design to explore children’s (N = 310) information-seeking behaviors towards technological and human sources in the science domain. In Experiment 1 (N = 143), we asked whether children (aged 4–6) are more likely to direct scientific questions towards and trust in scientific explanations from a digital voice assistant or a peer. The experiment included three parts: (i) scientific ask and endorse phase (ii) explicit judgement phase and (iii) digital voice assistant familiarity question phase. In the first part of the scientific ask and endorse phase, children were asked who they would rather ask to answer certain scientific questions. In the second part of this phase, the digital voice assistant and the peer each provided an explanation in response to that question. Half of the children were assigned to a condition where the digital voice assistant provided a noncircular explanation, and the other half of the children were assigned to a condition where the peer provided a noncircular explanation. In Experiment 2 (N = 167), we examined children’s preference to pose scientific questions to and trust in explanations from a digital voice assistant or a classroom teacher. Across both studies, children preferred to ask questions and trust scientific explanations from the digital voice assistant rather than the peer or the teacher. By understanding how children learn with and through digital technologies in the domain of science, we can design future interventions that leverage conversational AI to further enhance children’s science engagement and critical thinking skills during the early childhood years.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haber et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837003ed186a739981247https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050661
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper