Demonstrates improved instance segmentation accuracy in sonar images, highlighting advanced techniques for marine debris tracking.
In order to efficiently clean up marine debris, it is necessary to obtain the types and locations of marine debris. By using instance segmentation on the sonar images of marine debris, the types and locations of marine debris can be obtained. An improved YOLOv8n‐seg (model), for instance, segmentation of the sonar images of marine debris, is proposed in this article. For this purpose, the backbone (network) of the improved YOLOv8n‐seg is designed by proposing the model C2PC‐Cone (cross‐stage partial bottleneck with two partial convolutions and cone activation function) and replacing the module C2f (cross‐stage partial bottleneck with two convolutions) in the backbone of the YOLOv8n‐seg with the C2PC‐Cone; the neck (network) of the improved YOLOv8n‐seg is designed by replacing the module C2f in the neck of the YOLOv8n‐seg with the module VoV‐GSCSP (variety of view gather‐scatter cross‐stage partial); and the head (network) of the improved YOLOv8n‐seg, named the SA‐segment, is designed by introducing the self‐attention module. Experimental results on the selected dataset of the sonar images of marine debris show that the improved YOLOv8n‐seg achieved P (precision) of 83.6%, R (recall) of 87.9%, mAP@50 (mean average precision at IoU 0.5, where IoU denotes Intersection over Union) of 88.9%, and mAP@50‐95 (mean average precision at IoU range 0.5–0.95) of 54.2%, with only 8.9G FLOPs (floating point operations) and 2.550 M NOPs (number of parameters). For instance segmentation on the selected dataset of the sonar images of marine debris, compared to the YOLOv8n‐seg, the improved YOLOv8n‐seg has better evaluation metrics for P , R , mAP@50, mAP@50‐95, FLOPs, and NOPs. These experimental results validate the effectiveness of the improved YOLOv8n‐seg in enhancing segmentation accuracy while lowering the resource consumption and the computational complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: