Analyzes forest degradation in Ben En National Park, suggesting management strategies to combat ecological loss.
The forest within the Ben En National Park has a diverse flora, which, although protected, remains subject to degradation. The analysis and management strategies for forest degradation within this park were conducted using a phytogeographical approach supplemented by satellite imagery and a SWOT analysis. As a result, the area is characterized by nine distinct vegetation types comprising 1417 vascular plant species (from 902 genera and 196 families). These species belong to endemics from Northern, Central, and all of Vietnam, as well as 16 other phytogeographical elements. Tropical Asian and South China elements dominate the community structure in evergreen broad-leaved closed forests on both limestone and non-limestone mountains. Forest degradation is evident in changes to both floristic composition and vegetation structure. Floristic composition shows a trend of decreasing native elements while simultaneously increasing non-native or introduced elements. This “anthropogenic tropicalization” leads to a declining chain of ecological function from palaeotropical to introduced elements, resulting in biological invasion. For instance, the invasive species, Mimosa pigra, currently occupies about 442 ha in the semi-submerged zone of the Song Muc reservoir, indicating a loss of ecological function and a likely hydrological pathway for further spread. As a consequence of “anthropogenic tropicalization”, the vegetation is fragmented and gradually altered from a natural system to an anthropogenic one through a regressive succession from primary forest to bare land/invaded area. Based on the SWOT analysis, four management actions were proposed: 1—Establish a “sustainable native forest” program and “invasive species control” in the Song Muc reservoir; 2—Launch a “green livelihoods for the buffer zone” initiative; 3—Implement a “Smart forest monitoring” system; and 4—Forge an “ecotourism-conservation-community” alliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
THI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: