Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses propulsive efficiency improvements in UUVs, indicating effective optimization strategies.
Under hull–propulsor coupling conditions, the geometric shape of an unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) can significantly affect the inflow conditions of the aft rim-driven thruster (RDT) and, consequently, its propulsive performance. However, the number of UUV shape design parameters is relatively large, and their influences on the propulsive efficiency of the RDT differ markedly. If an equal-weight search strategy is still adopted for optimization, the computational cost will increase and the optimization efficiency will be reduced. To address this issue, this paper proposes an efficient global-sensitivity-information-driven sequential surrogate-based optimization method for the shape optimization design of the UUV, with the aim of improving the propulsive efficiency of the RDT corresponding to the self-propulsion equilibrium state under the cruise condition. Based on the hull–propulsor coupled numerical model of the UUV and RDT, the proposed method obtains the propulsive efficiency of the RDT at the self-propulsion point under the cruise condition by solving the self-propulsion equilibrium condition. On this basis, Sobol global sensitivity analysis is performed using the Kriging surrogate model to quantitatively evaluate the influence of the UUV shape design parameters on the propulsive efficiency of the RDT. Then, the global sensitivity information is mapped into optimization weights. Based on this, the minimum of surrogate prediction (MSP) and expected improvement (EI) sampling criteria are introduced. In this way, a surrogate model sequential optimization method driven by global sensitivity information is developed. The optimization results show that, after optimizing the UUV external shape, the propulsive efficiency of the RDT under the cruise condition is increased by 22.83%, thereby verifying the effectiveness of the proposed method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: