Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates Insultrate's impact on blood sugar control in individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, suggesting safety and effectiveness.
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Insultrate, a physician-configured basal insulin (BI) titration module (tool) integrated within the Health2Sync (H2S) mobile application, as a digital intervention to reduce titration inertia among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: An open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study (NCT05684341) was conducted in Taiwan (February 2023 to June 2024). It involved people with uncontrolled T2D despite their existing insulin regimens who were insulin-naïve or using BI. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level at Week 24. RESULTS: Two hundred participants were randomized (1:1) to Insultrate or Usual-care groups; 191 were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (Insultrate: n = 93; Usual-care: n = 98). No significant difference in insulin adherence rate was observed between the two groups at Week 24, but Insultrate showed significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (-0.87 ± 1.20% vs. -0.43 ± 1.20%; p = 0.0109) and fasting self-monitoring blood glucose levels (-56.4 ± 62.4 mg/dL vs. -45.1 ± 54.7 mg/dL; p = 0.0258). No deaths, severe adverse events, or hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations were reported. Total treatment satisfaction was numerically higher in the Insultrate group than in the Usual-care group (2.4 ± 5.90 vs. 2.2 ± 6.81, p = 0.2143). CONCLUSIONS: Insultrate demonstrated favourable effectiveness and safety profiles and improved patient treatment satisfaction in this T2D population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: