PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 20267 citations

TxPert: using multiple knowledge graphs for prediction of transcriptomic perturbation effects.

View Full Paper
FWFrederik WenkelWTWilson TuCMCassandra Masschelein

Key Points

  • The aim is to accurately predict cellular responses to genetic perturbations using a deep learning method.
  • Developed TxPert, a latent-transfer-based deep learning method using multiple knowledge graphs.
  • Analyzed gene relationships from biological databases and high-throughput perturbation screens.
  • Evaluated model performance against unseen perturbations in different cell lines.
  • For single unseen perturbations, TxPert achieves performance comparable to split-half experimental reproducibility.
  • For double unseen perturbations, TxPert improves predictions by 8-25% over existing methods for single perturbations in different cell lines.

Abstract

Accurately predicting cellular responses to genetic perturbations is essential for understanding disease mechanisms and designing effective therapies. Yet, exhaustively exploring the space of possible perturbations (for example, multigene perturbations or across tissues and cell types) is prohibitively expensive, motivating methods that can generalize to unseen conditions. We present TxPert, a latent-transfer-based deep learning method that uses multiple knowledge graphs of gene (product)-gene (product) relationships to predict transcriptomic perturbation effects. Different knowledge graphs encode complementary information and we show that a combination of graphs derived from biological databases and high-throughput perturbation screens yields the best performance. For predictions of single unseen perturbations, TxPert approaches the performance of split-half experimental reproducibility. For double unseen perturbations and single perturbations in a different cell line, its predictions increase Person Δ for unseen single perturbations by 8-25% over existing methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wenkel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837ab3ed186a739981e91https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03113-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper