Review summarizes diagnostic challenges and treatment options for female urethral stricture disease, highlighting the need for standardized outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite increasing awareness, female urethral stricture (FUS) lacks standardization of definition, diagnostic criteria, and specific treatment algorithm. This review summarizes recent advances in diagnosis, treatment modalities, and surgical outcomes reporting. RECENT FINDINGS: The main challenges of diagnosing FUS are its nonspecific symptoms and overlapping differential diagnoses. Although a urethral caliber <14 French is commonly used, this threshold lacks diagnostic reliability. Emerging modalities, including translabial ultrasound, appear promising, but endoscopic confirmation remains essential. Urethroplasty has increasingly replaced urethral dilations in recurrent and primary FUS. Various graft materials demonstrate comparable short-term to mid-term success rates, though differences exist in donor-site morbidity, operative time, and anatomical suitability. Dorsal and ventral graft placements yield similar outcomes, with technique selection influenced mostly by stricture location and surgeon experience. Minimally invasive approaches emerge, including transurethral urethroplasties and drug-coated balloon dilation, expanding treatment options. Overall, heterogeneity in outcome measures hinders comparability across studies, underscoring the need for standardized definitions and validated PROMs to assess functional recovery. SUMMARY: Efforts should be made to achieve homogeneity in definitions of FUS, diagnostic and treatment algorithms, and postoperative follow-up protocols. Standardization of the outcome measures following FUS repair by integrating objective micturition parameters and validated PROMs is crucial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karapanos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: