PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 20260 citations

Congenital abnormalities in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: a scoping review.

View Full Paper
EKEliza KitchenerRTRachael ThurechtJMJemma Mackrill

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the existing literature on congenital abnormalities and their implications for child mortality in Pacific Island nations.
  • Conducted a scoping review across six databases and targeted web searches for grey literature.
  • Included literature from sixteen Pacific Island Countries and Territories.
  • Analysed extracted data into thematic summaries.
  • Seventy-two sources identified, with Papua New Guinea being the most frequently mentioned.
  • Congenital heart defects (17 cases) and neural tube defects (13 cases) were among the most reported abnormalities.
  • Findings showed variability in data collection, making it difficult to compare the burden of congenital abnormalities across Pacific nations.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pacific Island Countries and Territories experience disproportionately high rates of stillbirth, neonatal, and childhood deaths, yet the drivers of these outcomes remain unclear. The impact of congenital abnormalities within the Pacific has not been clearly established, despite these abnormalities being a leading global cause of infant and child mortality. This scoping review maps available literature to determine the current knowledge of congenital abnormalities in Pacific Island Countries and Territories. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched six scholarly databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINHL, Proquest, Web of Science and Google Scholar) in addition to performing targeted web searches for grey literature. Searches were limited to sixteen Pacific Island Countries and Territories and extracted data was analysed as thematic summaries. RESULTS: Seventy-two sources were included in the final review. Papua New Guinea was the most represented Pacific nation in identified literature. Congenital abnormalities were commonly reported without description or specification to identify the type of abnormality, but congenital heart defects (n = 17) and neural tube defects (n = 13) were most often reported. The burden of congenital abnormalities between Pacific Island Countries and Territories was not comparable due to limited and varied data collection and reporting methods in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploration of the body of knowledge on congenital abnormalities in Pacific Island Countries and Territories shows that there is an unequal representation of Pacific nations in literature focused on congenital abnormality research and reporting. This gap may reflect variations in the capacity for health research across different Pacific nations. The paucity of literature and generalised reporting of congenital abnormalities further demonstrates ongoing challenges to health surveillance pertaining to common causes of stillbirth, neonatal and childhood deaths in the region.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kitchener et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837d73ed186a73998221dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27322-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework2005 · 37,242 citations
  2. 2Neurological damage to the fetus resulting from severe iodine deficiency during pregnancy*2012 · 51 citations
  3. 3Surgical programme at Royal Alexandra Hospital, Sydney, for Papua New Guinea children with congenital heart disease, 1978–19942002 · 14 citations