Establishes how structural conditions define evaluability in Modal–Dependence Calculus, suggesting fundamental limits.
This paper establishes the structural conditions under which evaluability is defined within the Modal–Dependence Calculus (MDC). Admissibility is identified with the definability of the dependence relation D*(x, c), expressed by the indicator τ(x). Evaluability is thereby shown to be a consequence of structural constraints: a topology admits only elements for which τ(x) = 1. Non-invariant topologies admit elements where D* is undefined, constituting a failure of structural evaluability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin Jacobs (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: