Why the study?
Predicting the progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms is challenging, and combining circulating biomarkers with imaging may provide an alternative for risk stratification.
Do plasma TAT complexes, D-dimer, and aortic volumetry predict AAA growth and surgery incidence in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Do plasma TAT complexes, D-dimer, and aortic volumetry predict AAA growth and surgery incidence in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
The combination of hemostatic biomarkers (TAT, D-dimer) and CTA volumetry may help risk-stratify patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms for progression and need for surgery.
Predicting the progression of small aneurysms is a main challenge in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) management. The combination of circulating biomarkers and image techniques might provide an alternative for risk stratification. We evaluated the association of plasma TAT complexes (TAT) and D-dimer with AAA severity in 3 groups of patients: group 1, without AAA (n = 52), group 2, AAA 40−50 mm (n = 51) and group 3, AAA > 50 mm (n = 50). TAT (p < 0.001) and D-dimer (p < 0.001) were increased in patients with AAA (groups 2 and 3) vs. group 1. To assess the association between baseline TAT and D-dimer concentrations, and AAA growth, aortic diameter and volume (volumetry) were measured by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in group 2 at recruitment (baseline) and 1-year after inclusion. Baseline D-dimer and TAT levels were associated with AAA diameter and volume variations at 1-year independently of confounding factors (p ≤ 0.044). Additionally, surgery incidence, recorded during a 4-year follow-up in group 2, was associated with larger aneurysms, assessed by aortic diameter and volumetry (p ≤ 0.036), and with elevated TAT levels (sub-hazard ratio 1.3, p ≤ 0.029), while no association was found for D-dimer. The combination of hemostatic parameters and image techniques might provide valuable tools to evaluate AAA growth and worse evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández-Alonso et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: