Why the study?
Distinguishing physiological athletic cardiac remodelling from cardiomyopathy is a frequent medical dilemma where ECG and echocardiography alone may leave or generate uncertainty.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) improve the discrimination between athletic cardiac remodeling and cardiomyopathy compared to ECG and echocardiography alone?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) improve the discrimination between athletic cardiac remodeling and cardiomyopathy compared to ECG and echocardiography alone?
CMR is a valuable imaging modality in sports cardiology for distinguishing physiological athletic heart adaptation from underlying cardiomyopathy.
Exercise training induces morphological and functional cardiovascular adaptation known as the "athlete's heart" with changes including dilatation, hypertrophy, and increased stroke volume. These changes may overlap with pathological appearances. Distinguishing athletic cardiac remodelling from cardiomyopathy is important and is a frequent medical dilemma. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has a role in clinical care as it can refine discrimination of health from a disease where ECG and echocardiography alone have left or generated uncertainty. CMR can more precisely assess cardiac structure and function as well as characterise the myocardium detecting key changes including myocardial scar and diffuse fibrosis. In this review, we will review the role of CMR in sports cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maestrini et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: