PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1974Journal of neurosurgery388 citations

Normal-pressure hydrocephalus

View Full Paper
SSSherman C. SteinTLThomas W. Langfitt

Key Points

  • To assess the efficacy of shunting in patients diagnosed with normal-pressure hydrocephalus.
  • Followed 43 patients after shunting for 6 to 30 months.
  • Conducted complete preoperative evaluations, including clinical assessments and imaging tests.
  • Grouped patients based on shunt response and analyzed predictive values of preoperative tests.
  • 80% improvement in patients with known etiology of hydrocephalus (8 out of 10).
  • 64% of the remaining patients showed some improvement; only 24% had substantial and sustained improvement.
  • No significant relationship between shunt outcomes and preoperative testing variables.

Abstract

✓ After shunting, 43 patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus were followed for 6 to 30 months. All patients had complete preoperative clinical evaluations, pneumoencephalograms, and isotope cisternography; in addition, 21 had saline infusion studies, and 15 had biopsies. Of the 10 patients in whom the etiology of the hydrocephalus was known eight (80%) were significantly improved. Of the other 33 patients, 21 (64%) showed some improvement; this was substantial and sustained in only eight (24%). The whole series of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus was divided into two groups on the basis of shunt response and the relative predictive values of preoperative tests. No significant association was found between the results of shunting and preoperative clinical factors, pneumoencephalography, isotope cisternography, saline infusion tests, or various combinations of clinical and laboratory abnormalities. The significance of these findings is discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stein et al. (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f9767bdbaca2258114f2b2https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.41.4.0463
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper