Key result
ACS Surgical Risk Calculator best predicts 30-day cranial neurosurgery mortality with an 0.87 C-statistic.
Why the study?
The comparative accuracy of various frailty and nutritional risk stratification indices across complication domains and cranial neurosurgical indications remains uncertain.
Which preoperative risk metric best predicts 30-day morbidity and mortality in adults undergoing cranial neurosurgery?
Observational (n=77,514)
Yes
Which preoperative risk metric best predicts 30-day morbidity and mortality in adults undergoing cranial neurosurgery?
The ACS-SRC and serum albumin are the most accurate preoperative tools for predicting 30-day adverse outcomes after cranial neurosurgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Superior to frailty metrics for ACS mortality prediction; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Frailty and nutritional status are increasingly recognized as key determinants of perioperative outcomes in cranial neurosurgery. Numerous indices, including the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC), are used for risk stratification, yet their comparative accuracy across complication domains and neurosurgical indications remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive performance of five preoperative risk metrics, ACS-SRC, serum albumin, Risk Analysis Index (RAI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and Modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5), for forecasting postoperative morbidity and mortality after cranial neurosurgery performed for trauma, tumor, vascular, or functional indications. METHODS: Adults (>18 years) undergoing cranial neurosurgical procedures in the ACS NSQIP database (2017-2022) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aORs). Discriminative performance was measured using ROC analysis and C-statistics (DeLong test). Subgroup analyses were stratified by surgical indication. RESULTS: Among 77,514 patients, the ACS-SRC demonstrated the highest accuracy across outcomes, with C-statistics of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.87-0.88) for mortality, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.72-0.73) for overall complications, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.74-0.75) for major complications. Serum albumin was the next strongest predictor (mortality C-statistic 0.68, 95% CI: 0.67-0.69), outperforming or equaling frailty metrics on most endpoints. RAI exceeded mFI-5 in predictive value (mortality C-statistic 0.70, 95% CI: 0.69-0.71), while GNRI performed similarly to mFI-5 but below RAI. Higher RAI, mFI-5, and ACS-SRC scores, along with lower albumin levels, independently predicted increased 30-day mortality and complications. Subgroup analyses showed that ACS-SRC and serum albumin maintained strong performance across trauma, tumor, and vascular cohorts. CONCLUSION: ACS-SRC remains among the most accurate preoperative tools for predicting adverse outcomes after cranial neurosurgery. Serum albumin offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a practical alternative when calculator inputs are incomplete. These findings reinforce the value of structured risk stratification for surgical counseling and outcome optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farid et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cranial neurosurgery (n=77,514). American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC) vs. Serum albumin, RAI, GNRI, and mFI-5 was evaluated on 30-day mortality (C-statistic 0.87, 95% CI 0.87-0.88). The American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator demonstrated the highest accuracy for predicting 30-day mortality after cranial neurosurgery (C-statistic 0.87; 95% CI 0.87-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: