Evaluates antimicrobial efficacy on foodborne pathogens in acid-stressed conditions, indicating food safety concerns.
Although acidification is widely used as a hurdle strategy to control foodborne pathogens, sublethal acid stress can enable pathogen survival and recovery, posing a food safety concern. This study assessed the impact of acid stress on foodborne pathogens and evaluated the efficacy of VERDAD N6 and ε-polylysine (ε-PL) against acid-stressed cells in broth and acidified cooked rice. Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus cereus (vegetative cells and spores) were screened for susceptibility to 0.5% acetic, lactic, and malic acids. Among the tested organisms, E. coli O157:H7 showed the highest tolerance to acetic acid, whereas B. cereus spores exhibited negligible reduction (<0.2 log). The combined antimicrobial effects of acetic acid, VERDAD N6, and ε-PL were further evaluated for E. coli O157:H7 and B. cereus, alongside ultrastructural analysis using transmission electron microscopy. In broth, 1% VERDAD N6 reduced growth rate, while 1% ε-PL resulted in complete inactivation. In acidified cooked rice (pH ≤ 4.6), acetic acid served as the primary hurdle against acid-stressed E. coli O157:H7. Supplementation with 0.5% VERDAD N6 and ε-PL at concentrations ≥0.01% further accelerated population decline during storage at 10 and 25 °C. In contrast, vegetative cells and spores of B. cereus showed minimal changes (<0.3 log). Microscopy revealed severe membrane disruption and ghost cell formation in E. coli O157:H7, whereas B. cereus exhibited limited structural damage. Overall, the combined treatment of acetic acid, VERDAD N6, and ε-PL was effective against acid-stressed E. coli O157:H7 but insufficient for controlling B. cereus spores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: