Compares immunity and lung protection between two vaccine types in pigs, suggesting safer options for swine IAV vaccination.
The substantial antigenic diversity of Influenza A virus (IAV) presents significant challenges to the development of broadly protective vaccines for swine. Moreover, pigs vaccinated with whole-inactivated virus or hemagglutinin (HA) subunit vaccines may experience more severe lung consolidation than non-vaccinated pigs when exposed to antigenically mismatched IAV strains, a phenomenon known as vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD). We recently developed a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated DNA (LNP-DNA) vaccine encoding the HA of IAV, which elicited robust immune responses following a single immunization and protected pigs against homologous IAV challenges. In this study, we compared the immunogenicity and protective efficacy between the HA protein-based vaccine and the HA DNA-based vaccine against an antigenically mismatched IAV strain in pigs. Neither vaccine induced cross-reactive hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies nor prevented viral shedding in nasal secretions following heterologous challenge. However, while the HA protein-based vaccine exacerbated lung lesions compared to non-vaccinated controls, the HA DNA-based vaccine prevented the development of gross lung pathology. Transcriptomic analyses revealed distinct gene expression profiles between the two vaccine groups. These findings suggest that the LNP-DNA vaccine platform may offer a safer and more effective strategy for developing vaccines against IAV in swine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: