Quasi-experimental research reveals Guided Inquiry boosts achievement in pre-service teachers, suggesting a better teaching method.
This study investigated the effect of Guided Inquiry (GI) on pre-service teachers' academic achievement and retention in photosynthesis. A quasi-experimental research design was used with 65 pre-service teachers, where 32 were assigned to the experimental group (EG) and 33 to the control group (CG). Data were collected using a Learners' Achievement Test and analysed using descriptive statistics: means and standard deviations, and inferential statistics, including T-tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Both groups completed a pretest, and no significant difference was recorded in prior knowledge (p > .05). Post-tests measured pre-service teachers' achievement and retention after teaching both groups. A T-tests showed that learners taught using GI scored significantly higher than those taught using Traditional Teaching (TT) (p < .05). ANCOVA, controlling pretest scores, confirmed a significant effect of the teaching approach on post-test achievements in favour of GI (p < .05). Differences between male and female achievements were not statistically significant (p > .05). The findings suggest that GI enhances conceptual understanding and retention in science education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Israel Kibirige (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: