Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article offers a historical-systematic reconstruction of Julius Ebbinghaus’s Relativer und absoluter Idealismus (1910) as an internal critique of Southwestern Neo-Kantianism. It examines Ebbinghaus’s diagnosis of the structural instability of transcendental philosophy when validity ( Geltung ) is conceived as relative and referred to an external ground. Through a critical engagement with Windelband, Rickert, and Lask, the paper reconstructs young Ebbinghaus’s reinterpretation of Kantian synthesis as a self-grounding process in which the dualisms of form and content, thought and being, are overcome. From this perspective, absolute idealism appears, in Ebbinghaus’s own account, not as a rejection of critical philosophy but as its immanent systematic completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabato Danzilli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: