Theoretical framework unravels wealth revaluation driven by demand trends, influencing allocation strategies.
The core innovation of this paper can be summarized in three propositions: Demand determines Scarcity, Trend drives Revaluation, and Wealth is amplified by Trend. A core concept, "Trend Value", and an analytical framework, "Trend Economics". Trends are not some mysterious spontaneous order, but rather the result of the dynamic changes in demand, supply, and real-world conditions within the material world. Traditional views of wealth regard it as the linear accumulation of labor or the price differential gained from asset transactions. However, this perspective struggles to explain why identical inputs yield vastly different returns across different eras and industries. This paper proposes a fundamental shift in perspective: "People's needs are trends", The essence of wealth is the revaluation of labor and assets by the trends of the era, with the root driving trends being human demand. This paper argues that scarcity does not stem from absolute material scarcity but arises from the expansion of demand—when something is widely desired, it transforms from “existence” into “scarcity.” Based on this, the paper constructs a wealth determination model: W=W0+L×TL+A×TA, where W represents wealth, L is the labor base, A is the asset base, and T is the coefficient for the trend of the era. The model reveals that wealth is not “earned” but “multiplied”: when an economic entity’s labor or assets align with a trend (T > 1), wealth expands; when they deviate from a trend (T < 1), wealth shrinks. This paper proposes the mechanism for Trend Formation: T = f(D,R)/S, where D represents demand, R represents realistic conditions, and S represents supply. Supply is the foundation, while demand and realistic conditions are dominant. When demand is triggered, realistic conditions mature, and supply is relatively insufficient, T rises and a trend initiates; conversely, the trend subsides. The paper introduces the concept of “Trend Value,” defining it as (TL - 1)L + (TA - 1)A, revealing the essential composition of wealth—the value of any asset can be decomposed into base value and trend value, with trend value being the multiplicative amplification of base value by the era’s trend. The paper systematically analyzes the mechanisms of trend formation, evolution, and subsidence, proposing a phased division of the trend lifecycle. The paper introduces the concept of "Trend Fuel": it refers to all forces that can accelerate demand convergence, catalyze the maturity of existing conditions, and break through supply constraints. It encompasses not only capital, but also social consensus, institutional policies, and technological infrastructure. This paper reveals that the wealth growth of entrepreneurs and investors stems from their identification, promotion, and risk-bearing of trends, rather than mere capital rent-seeking or exploitation. Using examples like artificial intelligence and Pop Mart, the paper validates the universal explanatory power of the theoretical framework across both technological and cultural trends. Building on this, the paper attempts to construct an analytical framework for “Trend Economics.” The core competency of Trend Economics lies in understanding the dynamism of trends. Understanding this logic holds theoretical value and practical significance for government behavior, resource allocation, trend identification, and wealth management at the individual and societal levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: