Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To translate and culturally adapt the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire (WST-Q) into Italian, and to assess its reliability, measurement error and validity in manual wheelchair users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The WST-Q was translated and culturally adapted using forward-backward translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing with wheelchair users and rehabilitation professionals. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, [ICC]), measurement error (Standard Error of Measurement [SEM] and the Smallest Real Difference [SRD]) were calculated. Validity was examined through WST-Q scores correlations (concurrent validity) and known-groups comparisons (years of use, training) (construct validity). A General Linear Model (GLM) was used to explore the effects of clinical and demographic factors, accounting for interaction terms. Known-groups validity showed higher scores in participants with >2 years of wheelchair use and in those with training. GLM analysis identified significant effects of baseline pathology, wheelchair type, gender, and training, with several interaction effects, explaining 77-89% of score variance. CONCLUSION: The Italian WST-Q demonstrated excellent reliability, acceptable measurement error, and good validity. It is suitable for assessing self-reported manual wheelchair skills in Italian rehabilitation settings, supporting standardised and evidence-based practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rushton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: