Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative retrospective study finds modified Shehata surgery improves outcomes in children with cryptorchidism, suggesting better care options.
ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of a modified Shehata surgery with a condensed 4-week interstage interval vs. conventional laparoscopic one-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 70 children with unilateral intra-abdominal cryptorchidism (July 2020–June 2022), allocated to modified Shehata (Group A, n = 35) or one-stage orchiopexy (Group B, n = 35). The modified procedure involved laparoscopic traction/fixation followed by second-stage orchiopexy at 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were testicular volume and blood flow (Doppler) assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included serum testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) at 6 months, complication rates, success rate, and total treatment cost.ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable. Group A demonstrated significantly larger testicular volume at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.05) and superior blood flow at 6 months (97.1% vs. 77.1% ‘Rich’ flow, P = 0.032). Regarding secondary outcomes, Group A had more favorable 6-month hormonal profiles (higher T, lower FSH/E2, P < 0.05), a lower surgery-related complication rate (0% vs. 17.14%, P = 0.033), and a higher success rate (100% vs. 82.86%, P = 0.033), but incurred higher total cost (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe modified Shehata surgery with a 4-week interval yields superior testicular development, perfusion, endocrine function, and lower complications compared to one-stage orchiopexy, albeit at higher cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: