Demonstrates effective tiller quantification in bentgrass hybrids, suggesting automated methods improve breeding processes.
IntroductionTiller production is a critical determinant of turfgrass canopy density and plant performance, yet manual tiller counting is too labor-intensive for large breeding programs.MethodsTo address this limitation, we evaluated 770 plants from an interspecific bentgrass hybrid population and developed three automated approaches for tiller quantification: a classical edge-based segmentation pipeline and two deep-learning models, Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8. Using a large annotated image dataset, we assessed each method’s accuracy, robustness under occlusion, and computational efficiency. ResultsAlthough two-stage detectors are often expected to provide superior precision for complex plant structures, the one-stage YOLOv8 model achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.97) and processed images substantially faster than Faster R-CNN, while both the edge-based method and Faster R-CNN showed reduced performance in dense canopies. DiscussionThese findings demonstrate that recall-oriented one-stage detection can outperform more complex two-stage models for phenotyping tasks involving fine, highly occluded structures. The resulting workflow provides a reliable, high-throughput solution for generating biologically meaningful tiller counts and offers a transferable framework for integrating image-derived phenotypes into genetic analyses and breeding pipelines across grass species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferm et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: