Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved predictive accuracy of polymer flooding in synthetic and benchmark reservoirs, suggesting a new modeling approach.
Polymer flooding is a widely applied enhanced oil recovery method that improves sweep efficiency by increasing injected water viscosity and achieving a more favorable mobility ratio. Field-scale performance evaluation remains challenging when detailed reservoir data are unavailable, motivating the use of data-driven approaches such as Capacitance-Resistance Model (CRM). However, conventional single-phase CRM formulations neglect two-phase flow effects, limiting their applicability to polymer flooding. This study presents a two-phase CRM that explicitly incorporates polymer-induced viscosity variations and saturation-dependent mobility. The proposed approach was validated using two case studies, including a benchmark reservoir model (PUNQ-S3) and a synthetic reservoir using CMG STARS simulator. Results demonstrate that the two-phase CRM consistently improves predictive accuracy in synthetic reservoir cases, reducing forecast errors from 10 to 22% with the conventional CRM to consistently below 4% across both homogeneous and heterogeneous cases, demonstrating nearly a tenfold reduction in prediction error. Similarly, in the benchmark PUNQ-S3 case, forecast error decreased from 18% with the conventional CRM to about 9% with two-phase CRM. The two-phase CRM successfully captured polymer-induced mobility control, displacement dynamics, and interwell connectivity, whereas the conventional CRM failed under strong heterogeneity. The proposed two-phase CRM significantly outperforms the conventional formulation, offering a physics-informed, computationally efficient, and field-relevant framework offering strong potential for polymer flood evaluation under realistic reservoir conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhanabayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: