Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost of atrial fibrillation (AF) to health and social services in the UK in 1995 and, based on epidemiological trends, to project this estimate to 2000. DESIGN, SETTING, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contemporary estimates of health care activity related to AF were applied to the whole population of the UK on an age and sex specific basis for the year 1995. The activities considered (and costs calculated) were hospital admissions, outpatient consultations, general practice consultations, and drug treatment (including the cost of monitoring anticoagulant treatment). By adjusting for the progressive aging of the British population and related increases in hospital admissions, the cost of AF was also projected to the year 2000. RESULTS: There were 534 000 people with AF in the UK during 1995. The "direct" cost of health care for these patients was 244 million pounds sterling (approximately 350 million euros) or 0.62% of total National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Hospitalisations and drug prescriptions accounted for 50% and 20% of this expenditure, respectively. Long term nursing home care after hospital admission cost an additional 46.4 million pounds sterling (approximately 66 million euros). The direct cost of AF rose to 459 million pounds sterling (approximately 655 million euros) in 2000, equivalent to 0.97% of total NHS expenditure based on 1995 figures. Nursing home costs rose to 111 million pounds sterling (approximately 160 million euros). CONCLUSIONS: AF is an extremely costly public health problem.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Simon Stewart
Heart Failure & Transplant
Niamh Murphy
Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children
Andrew Walker
Alberta Health Services
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Heart
University of Glasgow
London School of Economics and Political Science
University of South Australia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stewart et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa89daaa3ec536f251219e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2002.008748
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: