PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 19, 2015European Heart Journal309 citationsOpen Access

A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial

View Full Paper
ALAlexandra J. LanskyJSJoachim SchöferDTDidier Tchétché

Structured PICO

Does the TriGuard HDH Embolic Deflection Device improve safety and reduce cerebral ischemic lesions compared to no protection in patients undergoing TAVI?

P
Population
85 subjects undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), multinational (13 centres in Europe and Israel).
I
Intervention
TriGuard HDH Embolic Deflection Device used during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
C
Comparator
No cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
O
Outcome
Primary in-hospital procedural safety endpoint (composite of death, stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications).safety

The use of an embolic deflection device during TAVI is safe and, while not significantly reducing the primary composite safety endpoint, may reduce ischemic brain lesions and improve cognitive outcomes.

Limitations

  • Exploratory study

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and performance of the TriGuard™ HDH Embolic Deflection Device (TriGuard) compared with no cerebral protection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: From February 2014 to March 2015, 85 subjects undergoing TAVI at 13 centres in Europe and Israel were randomized to TriGuard protection vs. no protection. Subjects underwent neurologic and cognitive evaluation at baseline, pre-discharge and 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 ± 2 days post-procedure and at 30 days. Technical success, which included complete 3-vessel cerebral coverage, was achieved in 88.9% (40/45) of cases. The primary in-hospital procedural safety endpoint (death, stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications) occurred in 21.7% of TriGuard and 30.8% of control subjects (P = 0.34). In the Per Treatment population (subjects with complete three-vessel cerebral coverage), TriGuard use was associated with greater freedom from new ischaemic brain lesions (26.9 vs. 11.5%), fewer new neurologic deficits detected by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (3.1 vs. 15.4%), improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, better performance on a delayed memory task (P = 0.028) at discharge, and a >2-fold increase in recovery of normal cognitive function (MoCA score >26) at 30 days. CONCLUSION: TriGuard cerebral protection during TAVI is safe and complete cerebral vessel coverage was achieved in 89% of subjects. In this exploratory study, subjects undergoing protected TAVI had more freedom from ischaemic brain lesions, fewer neurologic deficits, and improved cognitive function in some domains at discharge and 30 days compared with controls.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lansky et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8aa29fa336b96d47da59https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv191
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper