Why the study?
What are the appropriate use criteria for multimodality testing in the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease?
What are the appropriate use criteria for multimodality testing in the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease?
This document provides updated multimodality appropriate use criteria for detecting and risk-assessing chronic coronary disease across various clinical scenarios.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Directs multimodality imaging selection in chronic coronary disease; updates prior AUC with current scenarios and ratings.
These clinical scenarios do not specifically address patients having acute chest pain episodes. They may, however, be applicable in the inpatient setting if the patient is not having an acute coronary syndrome and warrants evaluation for CCD.Using standardized methodology, clinical scenarios were developed to describe common patient encounters in clinical practice focused on common applications and anticipated uses of testing for CCD. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current ACC/American Heart Association guidelines. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9, following a modified Delphi process consistent with the recently updated AUC development methodology. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented, midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is rarely appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winchester et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: