To investigate the impact of different ground modeling approaches on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed trains, this study adopts a numerical simulation method based on Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equations. Aerodynamic noise sources and sound field characteristics of a simplified three-car high-speed train are compared between flat-ground modeling and refined bridge modeling. The results show that bridge modeling narrows the flow space beneath the train, leading to fragmentation and lateral overflow of vortex structures, thereby modifying the noise spectrum distribution. Under flat-ground modeling, sound energy is concentrated in the mid-frequency range (250–1600 Hz) with higher source intensity, while bridge modeling disperses sound energy toward both low and high frequencies, resulting in an overall reduction in noise level. The study further reveals that the underbody region serves as the main noise contributor. Although bridge modeling reduces overall noise by decreasing the underbody-to-rail gap, the fragmented vortex structures simultaneously enhance low- and high-frequency noise components. In terms of far-field noise, bridge modeling yields lower sound pressure levels; however, the difference between bridge and flat-ground modeling gradually widens downstream, reaching a maximum of ∼4 dB. This variation is attributed to the combined effects of mid-frequency sound energy peaks and high-frequency sound energy contributions.
Lu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: