PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026GeoJournal2 citationsOpen Access

The evolution of sustainable urbanization and urban informality over the past 25 years: a bibliometric analysis

View Full Paper
OOOyewale OyeleyeOsun State UniversityLBLiora BigonAriel University

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze trends in sustainable urbanization and urban informality over the past 25 years.
  • Employed bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review on 1913 Scopus-indexed articles (2000–2024)
  • Investigated scholarship trends, urban informality causes, and progress towards sustainability
  • Included analysis of geographic information systems methodologies for spatial analyses
  • Identified major contributors to sustainable urbanization research as China, the United States, and the United Kingdom
  • Noted that formal planning frameworks in the Global South often fail to align with local dynamics
  • Highlighted that cities in the Global North have made more progress towards sustainable urbanization compared to the Global South

Abstract

Abstract Urbanization is accelerating rapidly, particularly across Asia and Africa. Since 2000, sustainable urbanization (SU) has been central to global policy agendas, including the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda. This study employs bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review (SLR) to examine 1913 Scopus-indexed articles (2000–2024), addressing three research questions: (1) What scholarship trends have emerged in sustainable urbanization and urban informality (SU-UI) research over the last 25 years? (2) Are manifestations of urban informality (UI) in the Global South (GS) primarily associated with limitations in formal planning frameworks or governance deficiencies, and what are the possible ways forward? (3) In the global agenda on sustainability, which primarily aims to address urbanization challenges, how much progress have cities around the world made towards SU? China, the United States, and the United Kingdom are the most productive contributors to SU-UI scholarship, while research on UI from India and on SU from China carries considerable global influence. Formal planning frameworks in many developing countries exhibit limited alignment with local urban dynamics, generating sociospatial challenges, while governance arrangements in the GS require reform to better reflect global sustainability objectives. Cities in the Global North (GN) demonstrate comparatively greater progress towards SU, offering context-dependent lessons for the GS. Future research directions include the investigation of southern-inclined planning and governance approaches, spatial analyses of SU-UI using geographic information systems methodologies, and how emerging post-2030 global development frameworks may reshape research priorities and policy directions in SU-UI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oyeleye et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e3804f884e66b5307behttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-026-11642-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper