Automated analysis improves fracture geometry estimation in hydraulic fracturing, suggesting enhanced evaluation techniques.
Hydraulic fracture geometry is of great importance for evaluating stimulation effectiveness and supporting the efficient development of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, and it can be estimated from field shut-in water hammer signals. However, field signals are commonly characterized by strong noise, pronounced non-stationarity, strong dependence on manual extraction of effective response segments, and limited automation in inversion analysis. To address these issues, this study develops an integrated automated interpretation framework for shut-in water hammer analysis, which combines an adaptive shape-preserving Kalman filter for non-stationary signal denoising, an automatic response segment identification method, and a particle swarm optimization-based inversion strategy for fracture geometry estimation. The framework is validated using field high-frequency pressure data from hydraulically fractured wells. The results show that the proposed denoising method improves the signal-to-noise ratio from 11.99 dB to 25.05 dB while preserving key transient features. The response segments can be extracted efficiently, with runtimes of 0.84–1.22 s and onset errors within 0–5 s. For a representative fracturing stage, the relative errors of the inverted fracture half-length and fracture height are 6.21% and 3.04%, respectively. The proposed framework provides a low-cost and field-applicable tool for fracture evaluation and engineering decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: